RLR
|
Okay, you're misinterpreting the circumstances Rosekay. You have to understand how much your brain has to do with influencing the palpitation events.
When patients wear holter monitors, it provides a sense of safety because they believe that it's going to determine the cause for the events that will hopefully lead to their successful treatment, or at the very least satisfy the patient that the holter has recorded the events. During this time period the patient is typically under a different state of mind than without the recorder, producing less incidence of palpitations in most instances.
When the monitor is no longer worn, apprehension slowly begins to return and the safety net of the holter no longer represents comfort, ultimately producing the same circumstances previous to wearing the holter and increasing the incidence of palpitation events.
I'm constrained to point out here that as physicians, we do not need to "catch" the events on the recorder to determine their nature. When we review an ECG, we are looking for the characteristic signs which produce arrhythmias which are of concern. In the absence of such signs, the patient's complaint of palpitation events can only represent those which are entirely benign in nature. It is only the patient who establishes the need for the events to be directly recorded in order to satisfy their unending worry that the events are both pathological and dangerous. Let me provide you with a common scenario from memory that typifies how patients are compelled to respond when discussing holter monitor results:
"There! Right There! Did you catch that one? I just had one. Is it showing up? Now what is it? Is that just the harmless kind? I've read that V-fib is dangerous and it has me concerned that the could be signs of V-fib. but you're saying mine are harmless, right? So they're definitely not V-fib, correct? What's weird is that I don't have near as many of these darn things when I wear the monitor as I do without it and it really frustrates me. You should see when they're really bad, like every 2 or 3 seconds or sometimes and it makes me light-headed like I'm going to faint. Is that normal? Can the dangerous kind do that as well? So then how do we know that the ones not being caught on the monitor are the same as the one it just recorded? I'm confused. Can you tell me for certain that these others are harmless too? I mean I know you've already said that, but you have no idea how much these darn things worry me. I just want to be sure. I can't even go do things that I used to always do because I'm so afraid that something is going to happen. I try and stay calm, but my thoughts just take off and I'm right back where I started. Is there anything we can do for it?"
So that's a brief example of the typical conversation from a patient wearing a holter. It's a struggle by the patient for reassurance which extends all the way to the events being potentially deadly. They just want the symptoms to go away and because the symptoms remain present, the patient once again becomes reinforced that something is wrong. Desperation can sometimes take shape because the patient can't seem to get relief from the unpredictable nature of the events and the sort of captivity it places upon them from being able to enjoy their life.
As long as you feel that these palpitations are dangerous or that they can somehow do harm, they will remain present. Only when you come to realize that firmly understanding the events to be entirely harmless with changes take place that cause the palpitations to diminish, sometimes entirely. There is no pill you can take to make them go away and regardless of how many times you have tests run, the results will always be negative because the relevant test equipment is designed to detect conditions which are harmful or that put the patient at risk.
You're going to be fine, but you have to begin looking to methods that will help restore your life once again and not persist in the belief that you are in danger or that more tests are simply needed to find the nature of the problem.
Best regards,
Rutheford Rane, MD (ret.)
|