RLR wrote on Aug 19th, 2010, 5:51pm:Mention was made of "being fearful." You'll recognize this to be a very common theme among most all who visit the site. The focus, however, must extend beyond any specific issue which makes you fearful and more toward why the fear itself seems to be universally present regardless of whether it's your health or other circumstances. This is the direction I would like you to proceed. Give thought to why fear would be produced without associating it with the palpitations or similar focus.
I’m quite enjoying the direction of the thread and am finding it quite a challenge to even come up with responses now. It is becoming increasingly difficult to proceed as others have mentioned but I would rather see it as a challenge and adventure than a barrier. You have talked in the past about avoidance rather than confronting problems so I will not avoid this one and will try to help move us along a little more.
You have asked us to discuss why fear is present in all cases regardless of the causes (health, financial concerns, etc.) of the fear itself. From an objective viewpoint, fear is a defence mechanism of some kind that has developed through evolution to help an organism escape danger. We perceive danger in many ways (my health concerns, for example) but regardless of what causes the danger, whether it be financial concern, health, or a hungry lion, the body responds the same way by producing fear in varying intensities (based on our perception) as a defence mechanism, which in-turn activates the ‘fight-or-flight’ response which is responsible for the physical symptoms we experience. The old saying “All roads lead to Rome” sounds appropriate, would this be accurate?
The problem being that we do not seem to have the ability to truly realise that we are in fact, not in danger. In another thread we were discussing why even though we know our symptoms are caused by anxiety, we still have them. I made the analogy that you can’t switch off an emotion or feeling simply by recognising it with the example of a gun pointed at your head. Knowing you are scared of the gun doesn’t make the fear stop. You countered with words to the effect of: would you still be scared if you knew the gun was unloaded? Of course the problem is that even though through rational and logical means we are able to determine our symptoms are not harmful, our ‘gut feelings’ tell us otherwise and we are unable to realise it. In other words, even though we can all come here and say “I know they’re harmless” and make ourselves think we believe it, most of us don’t actually truly believe it.
Surely then, the reason that our anxiety is chronically elevated above baseline levels is because of our continual misperception of danger to the point where we are literally in a constant state of low-grade fear. In the early stages of this development we were probably not even aware of what was taking place on a biological level until symptoms began to present themselves. The symptoms themselves also act as a catalyst to the cycle, inducing yet more fear which perpetuates the cycle and when left long enough, the original cause is forgotten and focus is solely on the symptoms themselves. Is this a correct assessment or just a convenient one? I think this may be what has happened to me.
I can only assume the misperception is based on a lack of knowledge and understanding of the events that are taking place. The instinctive, unconscious responses which govern our thoughts and emotional responses are controlled by our brains automatically (such as fear), but we have a certain degree of control over how we perceive them. For example, we may become desensitised to certain events that once made us fearful because the rational side of our thoughts has been able to make the determination that the danger is only perceived and holds no bearing over our actual safety.
Take the following example: a single tribesman out on the planes of Africa would be terrified if confronted by a 450lb lion. He knows his natural defences are no match for the lions, he knows he can’t outrun it and he knows he has no weapons: he’s going to die. However, that tribesman’s fear would likely diminish if another 10 tribesman came to his aid all wielding spears and flames. Some might even chuckle at the turn of events; the burly ‘king of the jungle’ now fleeing in terror because he had a ‘panic attack’, only his was in response to real danger.
A lot of people use the chicken and the egg analogy when describing their anxiety and symptoms, as if the symptoms came first, which was what caused their anxiety. We don’t seem to be aware of fear that was growing in response to something else, well before the onset of any symptoms, because the symptoms have now taken precedence in our minds. Is this true?
Continued below.